91
#1,861 of 19,145
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
91
#1,861 of 19,145
87
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Zimbrick Honda is faster
Scores 91 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 46% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
91
+3 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,358 ms
15% faster
1,599 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
188 ms
186 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.16
0.16
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
877 ms
29% faster
1,234 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
377 ms
46% faster
702 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
8.54 MB
35% lighter
13.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
317
294
23 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
207
196
11 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.12 MB
4.43 MB
13% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
90
92
+2 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
75
+25 pts
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Zimbrick Honda stacks up against its provider's average.