Faster92
#1,083 of 19,095
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Recent
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average88
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Way Scarff Ford is faster
Scores 92 vs 88 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 16% sooner.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Way Scarff Ford
DriverseatReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
92
+4 pts
88
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,498 ms
16% faster
1,781 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
220 ms
211 ms
4% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.06
0.07 less shift
0.13
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,105 ms
8% faster
1,207 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
470 ms
10% faster
525 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
7.67 MB
5.77 MB
25% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
244
196
48 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
175
139
36 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.08 MB
3.84 MB
24% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
97
+5 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
94
+1 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
80
+7 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Way Scarff Ford stacks up against its provider's average.