84
#6,302 of 19,160
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
84
#6,302 of 19,160
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Watermark Honda is faster
Scores 84 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 57% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
84
+5 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,763 ms
20% faster
2,203 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
153 ms
57% faster
353 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.22
0.17
0.05 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,208 ms
23% faster
1,568 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
865 ms
16% faster
1,033 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
3.3 MB
65% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
134
172 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
65
162 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.42 MB
67% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
91
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
+17 pts
56
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Watermark Honda stacks up against its provider's average.