79
#11,594 of 19,160
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
79
#11,594 of 19,160
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
W&l Mazda is faster
Scores 79 vs 79 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. First content appears 5% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
79
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,163 ms
2,203 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
508 ms
353 ms
30% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.11
0.06 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,495 ms
5% faster
1,568 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,053 ms
1,033 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
16.7 MB
9.3 MB
44% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
536
306
230 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
448
227
221 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
7.36 MB
4.23 MB
43% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
94
+9 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
95
+4 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
56
+6 pts
Nearby Mazda dealers, and how W&l Mazda stacks up against its provider's average.