79

W&L MAZDA

www.wandlmazda.com

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Recent

CrUX rolling 28-day window

Page and vendor scan

Recent

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement

Sitemap checked

Stale

Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old

Head to head

Verdict

W&l Mazda is faster

Scores 79 vs 79 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. First content appears 5% sooner.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

W&l Mazda
Dealer.comDealer.com

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

79

79

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

2,163 ms

2,203 ms

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

508 ms

353 ms

30% faster

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.11

0.06 less shift

0.17

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

1,495 ms

5% faster

1,568 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

1,053 ms

1,033 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

16.7 MB

9.3 MB

44% lighter

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

536

306

230 fewer

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

448

227

221 fewer

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

7.36 MB

4.23 MB

43% lighter

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

85

94

+9 pts

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

95

+4 pts

91

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

50

56

+6 pts

More matchups

Nearby Mazda dealers, and how W&l Mazda stacks up against its provider's average.