79
#11,416 of 19,145
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
79
#11,416 of 19,145
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Volvo of Midlothian is faster
Scores 79 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 17% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
79
+1 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,816 ms
17% faster
2,193 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
486 ms
358 ms
26% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.15
0.02 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,525 ms
3% faster
1,566 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,023 ms
1,031 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
30.8 MB
9.3 MB
70% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
234
72 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
150
77 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.45 MB
66% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
95
+4 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
56
+6 pts
Nearby Volvo dealers, and how Volvo of Midlothian stacks up against its provider's average.