88
#3,007 of 19,159
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
88
#3,007 of 19,159
87
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Twin Pine Ford is faster
Scores 88 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 19% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+1 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,411 ms
12% faster
1,607 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
282 ms
183 ms
35% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.14
0.15
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,032 ms
17% faster
1,249 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
571 ms
19% faster
708 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
21.9 MB
13.2 MB
40% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
488
294
194 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
393
196
197 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
7.56 MB
4.43 MB
41% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+7 pts
93
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
+1 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
69
75
+6 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Twin Pine Ford stacks up against its provider's average.