89
#2,393 of 19,158
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
89
#2,393 of 19,158
87
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Arlington Toyota is faster
Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 31% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+2 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,484 ms
8% faster
1,618 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
131 ms
31% faster
189 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.12
0.04 less shift
0.16
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,267 ms
1,252 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
796 ms
708 ms
11% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
23.2 MB
13.2 MB
43% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
305
294
11 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
192
196
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.34 MB
4.43 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
94
+2 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+21 pts
75
Nearby Toyota dealers, and how Arlington Toyota stacks up against its provider's average.