83
#7,171 of 19,145
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
83
#7,171 of 19,145
82
#10 of 24 providers
Verdict
Tom Wood Honda is faster
Scores 83 vs 82 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 30% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
83
+1 pts
82
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,639 ms
12% faster
1,872 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
151 ms
30% faster
215 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.32
0.30
0.02 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
949 ms
12% faster
1,083 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
545 ms
472 ms
13% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
8.26 MB
35% lighter
12.7 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
108
104 fewer
212
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
99
102 fewer
201
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.94 MB
57% lighter
4.49 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+5 pts
87
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
91
+1 pts
90
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+20 pts
80
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Tom Wood Honda stacks up against its provider's average.