Faster68
#17,804 of 19,146
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Stale
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
Faster
Provider average65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
T and J Ford is faster
Scores 68 vs 65 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 13% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
T and J Ford
Jazel AutoReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
68
+3 pts
65
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,418 ms
3,295 ms
4% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
176 ms
13% faster
202 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.14
0.07 less shift
0.21
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,822 ms
2,649 ms
6% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
2,423 ms
2,257 ms
7% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
7.18 MB
41% lighter
12.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
379
340
39 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
276
243
33 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.15 MB
5% lighter
4.36 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
92
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
90
+2 pts
88
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
78
+5 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how T and J Ford stacks up against its provider's average.