88
#3,089 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
88
#3,089 of 19,095
83
#7 of 24 providers
Verdict
Thomas Acura is faster
Scores 88 vs 83 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 60% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+5 pts
83
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,507 ms
2,494 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
97 ms
60% faster
243 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.06
0.06 less shift
0.12
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,320 ms
5% faster
1,394 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
836 ms
819 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
2.78 MB
45% lighter
5.09 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
128
34 fewer
162
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
116
17 fewer
133
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.07 MB
29% lighter
1.51 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
96
+4 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
91
+2 pts
89
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+11 pts
85
Nearby Acura dealers, and how Thomas Acura stacks up against its provider's average.