78
#12,631 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
78
#12,631 of 19,095
75
#18 of 24 providers
Verdict
Hunter Ford is faster
Scores 78 vs 75 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 52% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
78
+3 pts
75
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,173 ms
2,920 ms
8% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
229 ms
21% faster
290 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.16
0.04 less shift
0.20
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,565 ms
2,177 ms
15% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
527 ms
52% faster
1,091 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
14.3 MB
11.5 MB
19% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
278
274
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
233
224
9 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.29 MB
5.07 MB
4% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
94
+6 pts
88
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
75
+21 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Hunter Ford stacks up against its provider's average.