80
#11,040 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement · over 14 days old
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
80
#11,040 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Sill-TerHar Mazda is faster
Scores 80 vs 79 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 16% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+1 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,380 ms
2,205 ms
7% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
305 ms
16% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.13
0.04 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,629 ms
1,581 ms
3% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,225 ms
1,047 ms
15% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
10.2 MB
9.58 MB
6% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
509
308
201 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
416
229
187 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
6.17 MB
4.26 MB
31% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
83
91
+8 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
35
55
+20 pts
Nearby Mazda dealers, and how Sill-TerHar Mazda stacks up against its provider's average.