75
#15,050 of 19,144
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Recent
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Provider averageFaster#12 of 24 providers
Verdict
AutoGO sites are faster
Scores 80 vs 75 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. First content appears 31% sooner.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Shottenkirk Honda Rome
AutoGOReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
75
80
+6 pts
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,513 ms
2,511 ms
29% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
253 ms
236 ms
7% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.06
0.05 less shift
0.11
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,448 ms
1,682 ms
31% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,586 ms
1,185 ms
25% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.77 MB
8.43 MB
14% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
227
233
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
170
171
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.56 MB
27% lighter
3.52 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+7 pts
85
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
91
+2 pts
89
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
82
+9 pts
More matchups
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Shottenkirk Honda Rome stacks up against its provider's average.