Faster86
#4,977 of 19,164
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Sands Ford of Red Hill is faster
Scores 86 vs 65 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 82% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Sands Ford of Red Hill
Jazel AutoReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
86
+21 pts
65
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,633 ms
53% faster
3,463 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
150 ms
27% faster
205 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.26
0.19
0.07 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,156 ms
59% faster
2,849 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
446 ms
82% faster
2,457 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
5.88 MB
52% lighter
12.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
161
179 fewer
340
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
151
92 fewer
243
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.66 MB
39% lighter
4.36 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
92
+7 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
+5 pts
88
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+18 pts
78
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Sands Ford of Red Hill stacks up against its provider's average.