53
#19,026 of 19,145
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Stale
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
Provider averageFaster65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jazel Auto sites are faster
Scores 65 vs 53 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 24% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Sanderson Ford
Jazel AutoReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
53
65
+12 pts
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
4,387 ms
3,410 ms
22% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
279 ms
213 ms
24% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.25
0.20
0.05 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
3,407 ms
2,816 ms
17% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
3,075 ms
2,402 ms
22% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
6.85 MB
44% lighter
12.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
286
54 fewer
340
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
179
64 fewer
243
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.64 MB
17% lighter
4.36 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
77
92
+15 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
84
88
+4 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+18 pts
78
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Sanderson Ford stacks up against its provider's average.