89

SAM SCISM FORD

www.scismford.com

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Recent

CrUX rolling 28-day window

Page and vendor scan

Recent

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement

Sitemap checked

Not availableNo data

Latest recorded sitemap check

Head to head

Verdict

Sam Scism Ford is faster

Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. First content appears 19% sooner.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

Sam Scism Ford
DealerOnDealerOn

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

89

+2 pts

87

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

1,380 ms

13% faster

1,579 ms

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

159 ms

15% faster

187 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.17

0.15

0.02 less shift

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

994 ms

19% faster

1,223 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

634 ms

9% faster

696 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

6.68 MB

51% lighter

13.5 MB

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

418

295

123 fewer

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

325

197

128 fewer

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

3.71 MB

16% lighter

4.44 MB

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

100

+7 pts

93

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

93

+1 pts

92

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

69

75

+6 pts

More matchups

Nearby Ford dealers, and how Sam Scism Ford stacks up against its provider's average.