85
#5,435 of 19,159
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
85
#5,435 of 19,159
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Roling Ford is faster
Scores 85 vs 79 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 52% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
85
+6 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,816 ms
18% faster
2,205 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
171 ms
52% faster
353 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.16
0.02 less shift
0.18
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,273 ms
19% faster
1,572 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
980 ms
5% faster
1,036 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
6.52 MB
30% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
313
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
233
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.85 MB
33% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
86
91
+5 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
56
+6 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Roling Ford stacks up against its provider's average.