80
#11,103 of 19,159
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
80
#11,103 of 19,159
75
#18 of 24 providers
Verdict
Quality Mazda is faster
Scores 80 vs 75 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 23% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+5 pts
75
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,770 ms
2,813 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
216 ms
23% faster
280 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.16
0.04 less shift
0.20
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,822 ms
14% faster
2,118 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
936 ms
12% faster
1,059 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.1 MB
21% lighter
11.5 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
233
41 fewer
274
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
187
37 fewer
224
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
6.16 MB
5.06 MB
18% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
83
88
+5 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
65
75
+10 pts
Nearby Mazda dealers, and how Quality Mazda stacks up against its provider's average.