81
#9,917 of 19,161
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
81
#9,917 of 19,161
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Putnam Ford is faster
Scores 81 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 43% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
81
+2 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,508 ms
2,193 ms
13% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
209 ms
43% faster
365 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.18
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,506 ms
3% faster
1,559 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
958 ms
6% faster
1,023 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
7.03 MB
24% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
242
64 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
140
87 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.27 MB
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+1 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
56
+6 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Putnam Ford stacks up against its provider's average.