81
#9,104 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
81
#9,104 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Phil Smith Acura is faster
Scores 81 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 11% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
81
+3 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,971 ms
11% faster
2,205 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
334 ms
8% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.14
0.03 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,494 ms
5% faster
1,581 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,067 ms
1,047 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
7.98 MB
15% lighter
9.36 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
381
306
75 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
298
228
70 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.45 MB
4.23 MB
5% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
94
+9 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+1 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
55
+1 pts
Nearby Acura dealers, and how Phil Smith Acura stacks up against its provider's average.