Faster84
#6,917 of 19,095
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Recent
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average81
#11 of 24 providers
Verdict
Performance Volvo is faster
Scores 84 vs 81 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 28% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Performance Volvo
MotiveReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
84
+3 pts
81
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,765 ms
2,645 ms
4% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
203 ms
28% faster
284 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.08
0.03 less shift
0.11
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,484 ms
14% faster
1,735 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
985 ms
986 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
14.1 MB
13.7 MB
3% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
314
246
68 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
204
141
63 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.36 MB
4.71 MB
12% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+4 pts
96
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
97
+2 pts
95
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
83
+29 pts
More matchups
Nearby Volvo dealers, and how Performance Volvo stacks up against its provider's average.