80
#10,740 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
80
#10,740 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Pearson Mazda is faster
Scores 80 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 9% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+1 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,294 ms
2,205 ms
4% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
335 ms
8% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,471 ms
7% faster
1,581 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
951 ms
9% faster
1,047 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
12 MB
9.39 MB
22% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
196
111 fewer
307
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
129
99 fewer
228
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.46 MB
42% lighter
4.24 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
95
+4 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
+18 pts
55
Nearby Mazda dealers, and how Pearson Mazda stacks up against its provider's average.