88
#3,382 of 19,165
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
88
#3,382 of 19,165
82
#10 of 24 providers
Verdict
Pallotta Ford is faster
Scores 88 vs 82 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 23% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+6 pts
82
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,508 ms
23% faster
1,948 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
214 ms
185 ms
14% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.20
0.14 less shift
0.34
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
910 ms
16% faster
1,085 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
438 ms
369 ms
16% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
10.4 MB
18% lighter
12.7 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
178
34 fewer
212
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
170
31 fewer
201
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.36 MB
4.48 MB
16% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
77
87
+10 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
86
90
+4 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+16 pts
80
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Pallotta Ford stacks up against its provider's average.