83
#7,075 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
83
#7,075 of 19,164
82
#10 of 24 providers
Verdict
Oxnard Mitsubishi is faster
Scores 83 vs 82 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 48% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
83
+1 pts
82
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,045 ms
1,850 ms
10% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
112 ms
48% faster
216 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.31
0.30
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
922 ms
13% faster
1,061 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
450 ms
8% faster
490 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.91 MB
22% lighter
12.7 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
123
89 fewer
212
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
112
89 fewer
201
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.39 MB
24% lighter
4.48 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
87
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
87
90
+3 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+12 pts
80
Nearby Mitsubishi dealers, and how Oxnard Mitsubishi stacks up against its provider's average.