88
#3,392 of 19,145
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
88
#3,392 of 19,145
84
#6 of 24 providers
Verdict
O’Malley Honda is faster
Scores 88 vs 84 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 46% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+4 pts
84
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,815 ms
26% faster
2,458 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
129 ms
46% faster
239 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.12
0.05 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,057 ms
24% faster
1,384 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
675 ms
18% faster
820 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
1.92 MB
64% lighter
5.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
125
38 fewer
163
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
93
41 fewer
134
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
927 kB
39% lighter
1.52 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+4 pts
96
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
90
+1 pts
89
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+11 pts
85
Nearby Honda dealers, and how O’Malley Honda stacks up against its provider's average.