63
#18,572 of 19,159
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Stale
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
Provider averageFaster65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jazel Auto sites are faster
Scores 65 vs 63 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 39% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Matthews-Currie Ford
Jazel AutoReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
63
65
+2 pts
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,753 ms
3,597 ms
4% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
253 ms
154 ms
39% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.14
0.09 less shift
0.23
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
3,193 ms
2,923 ms
8% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
2,625 ms
2,606 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
16.9 MB
12.2 MB
28% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
443
340
103 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
336
243
93 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.32 MB
4.36 MB
18% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
92
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
87
88
+1 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
78
+5 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Matthews-Currie Ford stacks up against its provider's average.