Faster88
#3,515 of 19,145
OVERALL
Pixel Motion
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
FasterProvider average76
#16 of 24 providers
Verdict
Lotus of Dallas is faster
Scores 88 vs 76 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 73% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Lotus of Dallas
Pixel MotionReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+12 pts
76
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,598 ms
36% faster
2,508 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
105 ms
73% faster
384 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.24
0.20
0.04 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
810 ms
59% faster
1,961 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
478 ms
63% faster
1,293 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.13 MB
13% lighter
10.5 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
91
206 fewer
297
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
47
149 fewer
196
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.49 MB
66% lighter
4.41 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
83
90
+7 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
81
86
+5 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+19 pts
73
More matchups
Nearby dealers, and how Lotus of Dallas stacks up against its provider's average.