89
#2,404 of 19,145
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
89
#2,404 of 19,145
87
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Landmark Honda is faster
Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. First content appears 23% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+2 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,245 ms
22% faster
1,599 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
196 ms
186 ms
5% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.16
0.01 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
945 ms
23% faster
1,234 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
559 ms
20% faster
702 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
15.8 MB
13.2 MB
16% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
187
107 fewer
294
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
84
112 fewer
196
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.1 MB
53% lighter
4.43 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
+1 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
77
+2 pts
75
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Landmark Honda stacks up against its provider's average.