89
#2,783 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
89
#2,783 of 19,164
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Land Rover Omaha is faster
Scores 89 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 66% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+10 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,498 ms
32% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
121 ms
66% faster
360 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,024 ms
35% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
735 ms
30% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
4.44 MB
52% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
168
138 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
93
134 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.15 MB
26% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+9 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
77
+21 pts
56
Nearby Land Rover dealers, and how Land Rover Omaha stacks up against its provider's average.