95
#281 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
95
#281 of 19,095
87
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
King O'Rourke Cadillac is faster
Scores 95 vs 87 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 31% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
95
+8 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,156 ms
27% faster
1,579 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
130 ms
31% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.05
0.10 less shift
0.15
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
839 ms
31% faster
1,223 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
546 ms
22% faster
696 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
10.4 MB
23% lighter
13.4 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
322
295
27 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
209
197
12 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.12 MB
4.45 MB
13% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
88
92
+4 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
75
+2 pts
Nearby Cadillac dealers, and how King O'Rourke Cadillac stacks up against its provider's average.