80

JIM VREELAND FORD

www.jimvreelandford.net

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Stale

CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old

Page and vendor scan

Recent

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement

Sitemap checked

Not availableNo data

Latest recorded sitemap check

Head to head

Verdict

Jim Vreeland Ford is faster

Scores 80 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 35% faster.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

Jim Vreeland Ford
Dealer.comDealer.com

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

80

+1 pts

79

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

1,986 ms

10% faster

2,205 ms

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

237 ms

35% faster

362 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.25

0.17

0.08 less shift

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

1,361 ms

14% faster

1,581 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

962 ms

8% faster

1,047 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

6.94 MB

26% lighter

9.39 MB

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

370

307

63 fewer

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

284

228

56 fewer

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

4.1 MB

3% lighter

4.24 MB

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

85

94

+9 pts

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

75

91

+16 pts

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

31

55

+24 pts

More matchups

Nearby Ford dealers, and how Jim Vreeland Ford stacks up against its provider's average.