80
#10,737 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
80
#10,737 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jim Vreeland Ford is faster
Scores 80 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 35% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+1 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,986 ms
10% faster
2,205 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
237 ms
35% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.25
0.17
0.08 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,361 ms
14% faster
1,581 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
962 ms
8% faster
1,047 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
6.94 MB
26% lighter
9.39 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
370
307
63 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
284
228
56 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.1 MB
3% lighter
4.24 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
94
+9 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
75
91
+16 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
31
55
+24 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Jim Vreeland Ford stacks up against its provider's average.