Faster89
#2,409 of 19,164
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average87
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jim O'Neal Ford is faster
Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 43% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Jim O'Neal Ford
DealerOnReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+2 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,355 ms
15% faster
1,588 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
106 ms
43% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.15
0.02 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,133 ms
8% faster
1,231 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
692 ms
705 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
7.2 MB
46% lighter
13.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
230
64 fewer
294
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
133
63 fewer
196
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.01 MB
9% lighter
4.43 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+7 pts
93
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+4 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+21 pts
75
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Jim O'Neal Ford stacks up against its provider's average.