Faster88
#3,147 of 19,164
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Stale
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
Faster
Provider average79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jim Cook Ford is faster
Scores 88 vs 79 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 55% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Jim Cook Ford
Dealer.comReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+9 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,984 ms
11% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
163 ms
55% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.08
0.09 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,279 ms
19% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
880 ms
16% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
5.78 MB
38% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
185
121 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
104
123 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.29 MB
46% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+9 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
+17 pts
56
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Jim Cook Ford stacks up against its provider's average.