84
#6,527 of 19,095
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Provider averageFaster87
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
DealerOn sites are faster
Scores 87 vs 84 and wins 1 of 5 Core Web Vitals.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Jim Click Ford
DealerOnReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
84
87
+3 pts
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,616 ms
1,579 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
170 ms
9% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.28
0.15
0.13 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,113 ms
9% faster
1,223 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
596 ms
14% faster
696 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
5.81 MB
57% lighter
13.5 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
206
89 fewer
295
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
117
80 fewer
197
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.21 MB
50% lighter
4.44 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
95
+3 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+21 pts
75
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Jim Click Ford stacks up against its provider's average.