77
#13,458 of 19,163
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
77
#13,458 of 19,163
65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jim Charlon Ford is faster
Scores 77 vs 65 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 47% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
77
+12 pts
65
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,484 ms
35% faster
3,802 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
87 ms
47% faster
165 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.12
0.12 less shift
0.24
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,210 ms
27% faster
3,043 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
2,018 ms
25% faster
2,700 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
30 MB
12.2 MB
59% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
378
340
38 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
273
243
30 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.78 MB
13% lighter
4.36 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
92
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
91
+3 pts
88
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
78
+24 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Jim Charlon Ford stacks up against its provider's average.