87
#3,907 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
87
#3,907 of 19,095
82
#10 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jim Coleman Honda is faster
Scores 87 vs 82 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 28% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
87
+5 pts
82
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,483 ms
20% faster
1,843 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
156 ms
28% faster
217 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.25
0.05 less shift
0.30
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
812 ms
23% faster
1,061 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
423 ms
12% faster
483 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.84 MB
23% lighter
12.8 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
153
60 fewer
213
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
142
60 fewer
202
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.87 MB
13% lighter
4.46 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
87
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
86
90
+4 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+16 pts
80
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Jim Coleman Honda stacks up against its provider's average.