Faster93
#807 of 19,095
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Recent
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average88
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
J.C. Lewis Ford Pooler is faster
Scores 93 vs 88 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 19% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
J.C. Lewis Ford Pooler
DriverseatReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
93
+5 pts
88
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,747 ms
1,781 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
170 ms
19% faster
211 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.04
0.09 less shift
0.13
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,085 ms
10% faster
1,207 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
462 ms
12% faster
525 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
7.12 MB
5.77 MB
19% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
199
196
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
147
139
8 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.63 MB
3.84 MB
17% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+3 pts
97
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
94
94
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
80
+7 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how J.C. Lewis Ford Pooler stacks up against its provider's average.