83
#7,299 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
83
#7,299 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jaguar Buffalo is faster
Scores 83 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 37% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
83
+4 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,167 ms
2,205 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
230 ms
37% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.13
0.04 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,467 ms
7% faster
1,581 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,024 ms
1,047 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
3.74 MB
60% lighter
9.44 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
139
168 fewer
307
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
78
150 fewer
228
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.3 MB
46% lighter
4.24 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+1 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
77
+22 pts
55
Nearby Jaguar dealers, and how Jaguar Buffalo stacks up against its provider's average.