86

JACK INGRAM MOTORS

www.jackingram.com

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Recent

CrUX rolling 28-day window

Page and vendor scan

Recent

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement

Sitemap checked

Stale

Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old

Head to head

Verdict

Jack Ingram Motors is faster

Scores 86 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 48% faster.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

Jack Ingram Motors
Dealer.comDealer.com

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

86

+7 pts

79

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

2,186 ms

2,217 ms

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

188 ms

48% faster

361 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.09

0.08 less shift

0.17

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

1,470 ms

7% faster

1,586 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

972 ms

8% faster

1,053 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

2.73 MB

71% lighter

9.3 MB

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

123

183 fewer

306

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

48

179 fewer

227

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

1.5 MB

64% lighter

4.23 MB

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

92

94

+2 pts

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

94

+3 pts

91

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

73

+17 pts

56

More matchups

Nearby Ram dealers, and how Jack Ingram Motors stacks up against its provider's average.