Faster91
#1,676 of 19,164
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Stale
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement · over 14 days old
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jack Ingram Motors is faster
Scores 91 vs 79 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 64% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Jack Ingram Motors
Dealer.comReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
91
+12 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,889 ms
15% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
131 ms
64% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.05
0.12 less shift
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,542 ms
3% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
586 ms
44% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
1.89 MB
80% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
135
171 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
20
207 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
824 kB
81% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+9 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+44 pts
56
More matchups
Nearby Porsche dealers, and how Jack Ingram Motors stacks up against its provider's average.