Faster80
#10,698 of 19,164
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Volvo of Charleston is faster
Scores 80 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 18% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Volvo of Charleston
Dealer.comReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+1 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,439 ms
2,217 ms
9% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
295 ms
18% faster
360 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,419 ms
11% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
993 ms
6% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
8.49 MB
9% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
292
14 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
204
23 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.49 MB
4.23 MB
6% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
90
91
+1 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
56
+6 pts
More matchups
Nearby Volvo dealers, and how Volvo of Charleston stacks up against its provider's average.