59
#18,863 of 19,164
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Stale
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Recent
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Provider averageFaster65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Jazel Auto sites are faster
Scores 65 vs 59 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 12% sooner.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Hemborg Ford
Jazel AutoReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
59
65
+6 pts
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,938 ms
3,463 ms
12% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
195 ms
5% faster
205 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.27
0.19
0.08 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
3,040 ms
2,849 ms
6% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
2,512 ms
2,457 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
6.33 MB
48% lighter
12.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
342
340
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
241
243
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.28 MB
25% lighter
4.36 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
66
92
+26 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
94
+6 pts
88
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
78
+5 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Hemborg Ford stacks up against its provider's average.