79
#11,178 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
79
#11,178 of 19,164
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Hare Honda is faster
Scores 79 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. First content appears 25% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
79
+1 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,820 ms
18% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
335 ms
7% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.26
0.17
0.09 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,194 ms
25% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
863 ms
18% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.83 MB
9.3 MB
5% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
221
85 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
154
73 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.34 MB
45% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
77
94
+17 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
82
91
+9 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
56
+6 pts
Nearby Honda dealers, and how Hare Honda stacks up against its provider's average.