67
#17,841 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
67
#17,841 of 19,095
65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Gillespie Ford is faster
Scores 67 vs 65 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 41% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
67
+2 pts
65
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,462 ms
3,468 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
121 ms
41% faster
205 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.16
0.03 less shift
0.19
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,921 ms
2,855 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
2,456 ms
2,470 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
45 MB
12.2 MB
73% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
320
20 fewer
340
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
220
24 fewer
244
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.55 MB
19% lighter
4.39 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
92
+7 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
83
88
+5 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
50
78
+28 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Gillespie Ford stacks up against its provider's average.