83
#7,089 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
83
#7,089 of 19,164
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Tom Peck Ford is faster
Scores 83 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 30% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
83
+5 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,987 ms
10% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
253 ms
30% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.16
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,333 ms
16% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
908 ms
14% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
898 kB
90% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
22
284 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
1
226 fewer
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
8.41 kB
100% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
97
+6 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
81
+25 pts
56
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Tom Peck Ford stacks up against its provider's average.