87
#3,865 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
87
#3,865 of 19,164
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Fitzgerald Ford is faster
Scores 87 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 58% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
87
+8 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,260 ms
43% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
151 ms
58% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.27
0.17
0.10 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
732 ms
54% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
441 ms
58% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
10.9 MB
9.3 MB
15% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
230
76 fewer
306
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
221
227
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.44 MB
19% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
94
+9 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+1 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
+17 pts
56
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Fitzgerald Ford stacks up against its provider's average.