92
#1,316 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
92
#1,316 of 19,095
87
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
Essenlohr Motors is faster
Scores 92 vs 87 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 34% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
92
+5 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,114 ms
29% faster
1,579 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
161 ms
14% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.15
0.15
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
905 ms
26% faster
1,223 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
460 ms
34% faster
696 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
8.79 MB
35% lighter
13.5 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
464
295
169 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
355
197
158 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.73 MB
4.44 MB
6% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+7 pts
93
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+4 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
69
75
+6 pts
Nearby Chevrolet dealers, and how Essenlohr Motors stacks up against its provider's average.