88
#3,099 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
88
#3,099 of 19,164
87
#4 of 24 providers
Verdict
Metro Ford Chicago is faster
Scores 88 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 30% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
88
+1 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,692 ms
1,588 ms
6% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
131 ms
30% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.18
0.15
0.03 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,074 ms
13% faster
1,231 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
580 ms
18% faster
705 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
8.73 MB
34% lighter
13.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
473
294
179 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
374
196
178 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.9 MB
12% lighter
4.43 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
86
92
+6 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
65
75
+10 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Metro Ford Chicago stacks up against its provider's average.