88

METRO FORD CHICAGO

www.emetroford.com

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Recent

CrUX rolling 28-day window

Page and vendor scan

Recent

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement

Sitemap checked

Not availableNo data

Latest recorded sitemap check

Head to head

Verdict

Metro Ford Chicago is faster

Scores 88 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 30% faster.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

Metro Ford Chicago
DealerOnDealerOn

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

88

+1 pts

87

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

1,692 ms

1,588 ms

6% faster

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

131 ms

30% faster

187 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.18

0.15

0.03 less shift

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

1,074 ms

13% faster

1,231 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

580 ms

18% faster

705 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

8.73 MB

34% lighter

13.2 MB

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

473

294

179 fewer

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

374

196

178 fewer

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

3.9 MB

12% lighter

4.43 MB

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

92

93

+1 pts

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

86

92

+6 pts

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

65

75

+10 pts

More matchups

Nearby Ford dealers, and how Metro Ford Chicago stacks up against its provider's average.