85

TIGERS FORD

www.tigersford.com

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Recent

CrUX rolling 28-day window

Page and vendor scan

Recent

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement

Sitemap checked

Stale

Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old

Head to head

Verdict

Tigers Ford is faster

Scores 85 vs 79 and wins 5 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 34% faster.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

Tigers Ford
Dealer.comDealer.com

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

85

+6 pts

79

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

1,944 ms

12% faster

2,205 ms

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

238 ms

34% faster

362 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.13

0.04 less shift

0.17

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

1,392 ms

12% faster

1,581 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

919 ms

12% faster

1,047 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

8.36 MB

11% lighter

9.36 MB

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

337

306

31 fewer

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

266

228

38 fewer

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

3.94 MB

7% lighter

4.23 MB

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

100

+6 pts

94

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

94

+3 pts

91

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

54

55

+1 pts

More matchups

Nearby Ford dealers, and how Tigers Ford stacks up against its provider's average.