82
#8,629 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
82
#8,629 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Cutter Ford is faster
Scores 82 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 50% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
82
+3 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,014 ms
9% faster
2,205 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
180 ms
50% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.20
0.17
0.03 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,420 ms
10% faster
1,581 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,055 ms
1,047 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.18 MB
9.39 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
455
307
148 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
363
228
135 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.35 MB
4.24 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
79
91
+12 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
31
55
+24 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Cutter Ford stacks up against its provider's average.